Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

The 2021 WHO catalogue of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex mutations associated with drug resistance: a genotypic analysis

305Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
54Institutions déclarées
18Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb, vn, it, us, es, Afrique du Sud, ch, br, in, cn, au, de, ca, se, pe, Madagascar, sg, be. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background Molecular diagnostics are considered the most promising route to achievement of rapid, universal drug susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC).We aimed to generate a WHO-endorsed catalogue of mutations to serve as a global standard for interpreting molecular information for drug resistance prediction. MethodsIn this systematic analysis, we used a candidate gene approach to identify mutations associated with resistance or consistent with susceptibility for 13 WHO-endorsed antituberculosis drugs.We collected existing worldwide MTBC whole-genome sequencing data and phenotypic data from academic groups and consortia, reference laboratories, public health organisations, and published literature.We categorised phenotypes as follows: methods and critical concentrations currently endorsed by WHO (category 1); critical concentrations previously endorsed by WHO for those methods (category 2); methods or critical concentrations not currently endorsed by WHO (category 3).For each mutation, we used a contingency table of binary phenotypes and presence or absence of the mutation to compute positive predictive value, and we used Fisher's exact tests to generate odds ratios and Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p values.Mutations were graded as associated with resistance if present in at least five isolates, if the odds ratio was more than 1 with a statistically significant corrected p value, and if the lower bound of the 95% CI on the positive predictive value for phenotypic resistance was greater than 25%.A series of expert rules were applied for final confidence grading of each mutation. FindingsWe analysed 41 137 MTBC isolates with phenotypic and whole-genome sequencing data from 45 countries.38 215 MTBC isolates passed quality control steps and were included in the final analysis.15 667 associations were computed for 13 211 unique mutations linked to one or more drugs.1149 (7•3%) of 15 667 mutations were classified as associated with phenotypic resistance and 107 (0•7%) were deemed consistent with susceptibility.For rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, fluoroquinolones, and streptomycin, the mutations' pooled sensitivity was more than 80%.Specificity was over 95% for all drugs except ethionamide (91•4%), moxifloxacin (91•6%) and ethambutol (93•3%).Only two resistance mutations were identified for bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, and linezolid as prevalence of phenotypic resistance was low for these drugs.Interpretation We present the first WHO-endorsed catalogue of molecular targets for MTBC drug susceptibility testing, which is intended to provide a global standard for resistance interpretation.The existence of this catalogue should encourage the implementation of molecular diagnostics by national tuberculosis programmes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
The 2021 WHO catalogue of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex mutations associated with drug resistance: a genotypic analysis
Date Crossref
01/04/2022
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

University of OxfordOxford University Clinical Research UnitVita-Salute San Raffaele UniversitySan Raffaele University of RomeIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ScientificoIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleUniversity of CambridgeEuropean Bioinformatics InstituteImperial College LondonBoston UniversityInstituto de Biomedicina de ValenciaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud PúblicaCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institute for Communicable DiseasesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchOxford BioMedica (United Kingdom)FINDWorld Health OrganizationUniversity of California SystemUniversity of California San DiegoUniversity of Cape TownInstituto Adolfo LutzFundação Oswaldo CruzFoundation for Medical ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of MicrobiologyThe University of SydneyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineResearch Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung CenterChinese Center For Disease Control and PreventionSynlab (Germany)Gates FoundationUniversity of British ColumbiaPublic Health OntarioPublic Health Agency of SwedenUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaStanford UniversityPublic Health EnglandUniversity College LondonInstitut Pasteur de MadagascarNational University of SingaporeNational Library of ScotlandThe Francis Crick InstituteWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in AfricaP. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research CentreUK Health Security AgencyUniversity of SurreyUniversité de MontréalGerman Center for Infection ResearchYale UniversityUniversity of AntwerpNew York State Department of HealthWadsworth CenterInstituto Nacional de Salud

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyMycobacterium research and diagnosisDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.