Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Gestational weight gain and maternal immediate perinatal and postpartum outcomes in low and middle income countries: individual participant data meta-analyses

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
102Institutions déclarées
37Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Objective To estimate the associations between gestational weight gain and maternal immediate perinatal and postpartum outcomes by pooling data from low and middle income countries. Design Individual participant data meta-analyses. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, based on three searches (Search 1: all prospective studies published from January 2000 to May 2021; Search 2: randomized controlled trials of balanced energy and protein supplementation published until June 2021; Search 3: randomized controlled trials of anti-infectious agents published until August 2021). Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Prospective studies (randomised controlled trials or observational cohort studies) with measured maternal weight during pregnancy and data available on maternal height, based in populations from low and middle income countries with no underlying conditions. Results The analyses included 156 300 women from 61 studies and 23 countries, with most participants based in South Asia (n=78 454, 50.2%) and sub-Saharan Africa (n=36 327, 23.2%). Compared with women with adequate (90-125%) gestational weight gain, women with excessive (>125%) gestational weight gain had a higher risk of caesarean delivery (risk ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.13, τ 2 =0.000) and emergency caesarean delivery (risk ratio 1.22, 1.03 to 1.43, τ 2 =0.000). Women with moderately (70% to <90%) or severely inadequate (<70%) versus adequate gestational weight gain had lower risks for caesarean delivery (risk ratio in women with moderately inadequate gestational weight gain 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.92, τ 2 =0.004; risk ratio in women with severely inadequate gestational weight gain 0.82, 0.77 to 0.88, τ 2 =0.010) and emergency caesarean delivery (risk ratio in moderately inadequate gestational weight gain 0.82, 0.71 to 0.95, τ 2 =0.004; risk ratio in severely inadequate gestational weight gain 0.73, 0.56 to 0.96, τ 2 =0.103). Excessive versus adequate gestational weight gain was associated with higher postpartum weight retained at any time point (mean difference 2.00 kg, 95% confidence interval 1.49 to 2.50, τ 2 =1.317), whereas moderately and severely inadequate gestational weight gain were associated with lower retained weight compared with adequate gestational weight gain. Similar trends were found for postpartum body mass index. Severely inadequate gestational weight gain was associated with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure at any time point post partum than adequate gestational weight gain. No associations were observed for other outcomes including postpartum depressive symptoms or breastfeeding. Evidence indicating an interaction between gestational weight gain and body mass index before pregnancy was found when examining the risk of caesarean delivery and postpartum weight retention, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure as outcomes. Conclusions These findings support the association between suboptimal gestational weight gain and adverse maternal outcomes in the immediate perinatal and postpartum periods. Further research examining the consequences of suboptimal gestational weight gain in low and middle income countries would be valuable to inform potential strategies to improve long term maternal health. Review registration PROSPERO CRD42023432836

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Gestational weight gain and maternal immediate perinatal and postpartum outcomes in low and middle income countries: individual participant data meta-analyses
Date Crossref
01/07/2026
Éditeur
BMJ
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Harvard Global Health InstituteIndian Institute of Science BangaloreUniversidade de São PauloBoston Children's HospitalGeorge Mason UniversityBrigham and Women's HospitalHarvard UniversityGates FoundationDubai Pharmacy CollegeUniversity of GhanaAga Khan UniversityUganda Virus Research InstituteJohns Hopkins UniversityInstituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando FigueiraInfectious Diseases Research CollaborationGhent UniversityInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease ResearchInsperTampere UniversityResearch Institute for Endocrine SciencesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesNorth-West UniversityUniversity of Health and Allied SciencesSociety for Applied StudiesHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversité de BordeauxInsermBordeaux Population HealthInstitut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementInstitute of Child and Mother HealthInstituto de SaúdeUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Instituto Nacional de PerinatologíaTulane UniversityThe George Institute for Global HealthUniversity College LondonUniversity of California, DavisKamuzu University of Health SciencesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulSt. John's National Academy of Health SciencesLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineNational Center for Communicable DiseasesSheffield Hallam UniversityUniversity of CopenhagenNational Institute of Public HealthNord UniversityInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of ZimbabweKamuzu Central HospitalUnited Nations Children's Fund NigerBoston UniversityNazi Boni UniversityInternational Food Policy Research InstituteUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroNational HIV/AIDS/STI/TB CouncilUniversity of Colorado DenverManipal Academy of Higher EducationKasturba Medical College, ManipalSt.John's Medical College HospitalInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la SantéUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreKK Women's and Children's HospitalDuke-NUS Medical SchoolAndalas UniversityUniversidad de Buenos AiresAdvanced Acoustic Concepts (United States)University of MalawiMother and Infant Research ActivitiesWashington University in St. LouisInstituto Politécnico NacionalUniversity of California, BerkeleyHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São PauloRTI InternationalUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillKing's College LondonMRC Unit the GambiaSultan Zainal Abidin UniversityUniversiti Sains MalaysiaBRAC UniversityMuhimbili University of Health and Allied SciencesAfrica Academy for Public HealthUniversity of ZambiaFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical ResearchUniversity of MichiganEmory UniversityUniversity of NamurBelgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE)Peter Doherty InstituteGlobal Forum for Health ResearchUniversidade Federal do AcreUniversity of Cape TownMilken InstituteGeorge Washington UniversityCharles Darwin UniversityMenzies School of Health ResearchUniversidade Federal de PelotasThe University of Texas at AustinIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNorthwestern UniversityXi'an Jiaotong University

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.