Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Personalized Hemodynamic Resuscitation Targeting Capillary Refill Time in Early Septic Shock

85Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
53Institutions déclarées
17Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Importance: The optimal strategy for hemodynamic resuscitation in early septic shock remains uncertain. Objective: To determine the effect of a personalized hemodynamic resuscitation protocol targeting capillary refill time (CRT-PHR) on a hierarchical composite outcome of mortality, duration of vital support, and length of hospital stay. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in 86 centers in 19 countries. Patients within the first 4 hours of septic shock were included between March 2022 and April 2025, with last follow-up in July 2025. Interventions: Patients were randomized to undergo CRT-PHR (n = 720), including assessment of pulse pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, fluid responsiveness, and bedside echocardiography, to tailor fluids, vasopressors, and inotropes, vs usual care (n = 747). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of mortality, duration of vital support (vasoactives, mechanical ventilation, and kidney replacement therapy), and length of hospital stay assessed at 28 days. A win ratio was calculated for the primary outcome by comparing all possible patient pairs, starting with the first event in the hierarchy and stratified by median APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score at admission. Secondary outcomes were mortality, vital support-free days, and length of hospital stay at 28 days. Results: From 1501 randomized patients, 1467 were included in the primary analysis (mean age, 66 [17] years; 43.3% female). There were 131 131 wins (48.9%) in the CRT-PHR group vs 112 787 (42.1%) in the usual care group for the hierarchical composite primary outcome, with a win ratio of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.02-1.33; P = .04). Individual wins for death were 19.1% vs 17.8%; duration of vital support, 26.4% vs 21.1%; and length of hospital stay, 3.4% vs 3.2% in the intervention vs usual care groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with early septic shock, a personalized hemodynamic resuscitation protocol targeting capillary refill time was superior to usual care for the primary composite outcome, primarily due to a lower duration of vital support. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05057611.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Personalized Hemodynamic Resuscitation Targeting Capillary Refill Time in Early Septic Shock
Date Crossref
09/12/2025
Éditeur
American Medical Association (AMA)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Spanish Clinical Research NetworkHospital Británico de Buenos AiresHospital Provincial de RosarioCentro Científico Tecnólogico - RosarioHospital Barros Luco-TrudeauPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileUniversity of ConcepciónCorporación Universitaria de Ciencia y DesarrolloUniversity of NariñoUniversité Paris-SaclayAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de ParisBicêtre HospitalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de ReimsHôpital Robert-DebréUniversité de Reims Champagne-ArdenneHomi Bhabha National InstituteTata Memorial HospitalIRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalAmiri HospitalInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador ZubiránUniversidad de GuadalajaraHospital Civil de GuadalajaraUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto DouroAdministração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do TejoHospital Del MarHospital de CrucesHospital General Universitario Gregorio MarañónHospital Universitario de La PrincesaClinica Universidad de NavarraHospital Universitari i Politècnic La FeUniversity Hospital ZurichGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustIcesi UniversityFundación Valle del LiliUniversité Libre de BruxellesHôpital Ambroise-ParéHospital Universitario 12 De OctubreHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de CandelariaMedical University of ViennaHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor BalmisComplejo Asistencial Universitario de PalenciaKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CentreHospital Universitario Río HortegaHospital General Universitario De ValenciaHospital General Universitario de ElcheHospital Clínico Universitario de ValenciaHospital General Universitario de Ciudad RealUniversidad de La SabanaInstituto Tecnológico de QuerétaroComplejo Hospitalario de OurenseInsperErasmus MCUniversidade de São Paulo

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationAcute Kidney Injury Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.