Refining Methods of Experience-Based Co-Design for Application in Aphasia and Cognitive-Communication Disability
Rattachement africain : au, ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: Co-design of research and services alongside end users is increasingly required by funding bodies and governments. To enable a meaningful inclusion of people with communication disability, planning and modification are required, as standard co-design procedures involve extensive spoken and written language. Experience-based co-design (EBCD) is one co-design approach that is gaining popularity; however, there are few detailed reports to date on adapting EBCD for communication disability. This article outlines our modifications of EBCD to co-design a technology-enabled self-management platform (Communication Connect) for people living with poststroke aphasia and cognitive-communication disability from traumatic brain injury. METHOD: = 20) across three Australian states. Data collection involved video-recorded interviews, focus groups, and structured prioritization workshops. This study describes the first four stages of EBCD (project setup, two experience-gathering stages, and identifying priorities). RESULTS: This article presents a detailed account of the practical decisions and modifications made throughout the EBCD process. Key adaptations are outlined, including the use of text-based video editing to efficiently create touchpoint films, nonlinear presentation of challenges to facilitate engagement, and visual aids to support prioritization and ranking. These modifications supported the meaningful participation of co-designers, including people with communication disability. CONCLUSION: This method article contributes to the growing knowledge on adapting EBCD for communication disability, which may be of use to future EBCD projects and for improving the meaningful inclusion of people with communication disability in co-design research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Refining Methods of Experience-Based Co-Design for Application in Aphasia and Cognitive-Communication Disability
- Date Crossref
- 06/11/2025
- Éditeur
- American Speech Language Hearing Association
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
La Trobe University Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Curtin University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
The University of Queensland Queensland Aphasia Research Centre pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Technology Sydney pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
The University of Sydney Acquired Brain Injury Communication Lab pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Acquired Brain Injury Ireland pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Monash University Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
National Stroke Foundation pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
The University of Melbourne Melbourne Medical School pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Bendigo Health pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
School of Allied Health pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Psychology and Public Health pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation — La Trobe University, Curtin University et Queensland Aphasia Research Centre — The University of Queensland, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.