Novel and optimized diagnostics for pediatric TB in endemic countries: NOD-pedFEND study protocol

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Pediatric tuberculosis is a major global public health challenge, with reliable diagnosis being a main obstacle to identifying and treating affected children. New and improved diagnostics, ideally on non-sputum samples, are urgently required, especially in the most vulnerable group of children under five years of age. Studies to date have been limited by small sample sizes and few bacteriologically-confirmed cases. Here, we describe the study protocol of the NIH-funded NOD-pedFEND study, which will be one of the largest diagnostic studies to date of children at greatest risk of tuberculosis. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we aim to evaluate existing and novel diagnostic assays, including pathogen- and host-based tests and combinations of tests. A consecutive cohort of children under five years of age with signs and symptoms of tuberculosis is enrolled in Uganda and Peru. All children undergo an extensive baseline workup with signs- and symptoms recording, microbiological reference tests, chest X-ray and tuberculin skin test for rigorous classification according to internationally recognized microbiological, composite reference and strict standards. An array of samples is collected for investigational tests. Follow-up visits are conducted at 2 weeks, 2 months and 6 months. A small cohort of healthy controls is enrolled to evaluate the specificity of selected diagnostics. The study has been approved by the relevant institutional review boards. DISCUSSION: With this large cohort study of children under five years of age, we aim to make an important contribution to the evaluation of new diagnostics for pediatric tuberculosis. By establishing a comprehensive biorepository, the study will also enable the assessment of novel tests as they become available during and after the study.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.