Microsurgical Lymphatic Vessel Transplantation for Chronic Lymphedema: Long-Term Evaluation of Volume Reduction and Lymphatic Transport Kinetics
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study investigates long-term volume reduction after microsurgical autologous lymphatic vessel transplantation (LVT) in patients with chronic lymphoedema. Lymphoedema is caused by inadequate lymphatic drainage and leads to swelling, pain, and a reduced quality of life. Conservative treatments often show only limited success, which is why surgical procedures such as LVT are increasingly gaining in importance. In a retrospective long-term analysis, patients who underwent LVT between 1988 and 2010 were examined on average 21.7 years after surgery. The examination included pre- and post-operative volume measurements, which were supplemented by modern 3D body scanner analyses and lymphoscintigraphy. The results show a significant volume reduction both in the short term (p < 0.01) and at the follow-up examination (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference between manual volumetry with circumferential measurements and 3D volumetry (p = 0.775). The improvement in lymph transport capacity was considerable (p = 0.078). This study provides valuable insights for the further development of lymphatic surgery. While preferred surgical methods change over time, this study demonstrates that LVT can make a decisive contribution to improving the quality of life of lymphedema patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Microsurgical Lymphatic Vessel Transplantation for Chronic Lymphedema: Long-Term Evaluation of Volume Reduction and Lymphatic Transport Kinetics
- Date Crossref
- 04/06/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.