In-Poor IGZO: Superior Resilience to Hydrogen in Forming Gas Anneal and PBTI
Le résumé fourni par la source
Integrating In–Ga–Zn oxide (IGZO) channel transistors into silicon-based ecosystems requires the resilience of the channel material to hydrogen. Standard In-rich IGZO (In = 40 metal at. %) suffers from degradation under forming gas anneal (FGA) and hydrogen-driven positive bias temperature instability (PBTI). In this paper, we demonstrate scaled, top-gated transistors with an atomic layer deposition (ALD)-deposited In-poor (In ≤ 17 metal atom %) IGZO channel that shows superior resilience to hydrogen compared to those with an In-rich IGZO channel. These devices, fabricated with a 300 mm semiconductor fabrication plant (FAB) process, with dimensions down to W CH × L TG = 80 × 40 nm 2, show excellent stability during a 2 h, 420 °C forming gas anneal (0.06 ≤ |Δ V TH | ≤ 0.33 V) and improved resilience to H in PBTI at 125 °C (down to no detectable H-induced V TH shift) compared to In-rich devices. We demonstrate that the mechanism of device degradation by H in the FGA is different from that of the H-induced V TH instability in PBTI. We argue that the first is due to oxygen scavenging by H, and the second, H release from the gate dielectric into the channel. We also show that resilience to H in one process does not automatically translate to resilience to H in the other. This significant improvement in IGZO resilience to H enables the use of FGA treatments during fabrication, needed for silicon technology compatibility, as well as further scaling and 3D integration, bringing IGZO-based technologies closer to mass production.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- In-Poor IGZO: Superior Resilience to Hydrogen in Forming Gas Anneal and PBTI
- Date Crossref
- 28/04/2025
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.