Neuropilin-2 functions as a co-inhibitory receptor to regulate antigen-induced inflammation and allograft rejection
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Co-inhibitory receptors function as central modulators of the immune response to resolve T effector activation and/or to sustain immune homeostasis. Here, using humanized SCID mice, we found that NRP2 is inducible on late effector and exhausted subsets of human CD4 + T cells and that it is co-expressed with established co-inhibitory molecules including PD-1, CTLA4, TIGIT, LAG3 and TIM3. In murine models, we also found that NRP2 is expressed on effector memory CD4 + T cells with an exhausted phenotype and that it functions as a key co-inhibitory molecule. Knockout of NRP2 resulted in hyperactive CD4 + T cell responses, and enhanced inflammation in delayed type hypersensitivity and transplantation models. Following cardiac transplantation, allograft rejection and graft failure was accelerated in global as well as CD4 + T cell-specific knockout recipients, and enhanced alloimmunity was dependent on NRP2 expression on CD4 + T effectors, and not on CD4 + Foxp3 + T regulatory cells. Also, knockout T regulatory cells were found to be as efficient as wild type cells in the suppression of effector responses in vitro and in vivo. These collective findings identify NRP2 as a novel coinhibitory receptor and demonstrate that its expression on CD4 + T effector cells is of great functional importance in immunity.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Neuropilin-2 functions as a co-inhibitory receptor to regulate antigen-induced inflammation and allograft rejection
- Date Crossref
- 23/04/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.