Contrast of Early Phase Amyloid PET
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background The method of obtaining pseudo‐cerebral blood flow images from the initial minutes of amyloid PET scans has been proposed. This technique proves to be highly valuable as it not only indicates the presence of amyloid accumulation but also reveals sites of neurodegeneration. However, the obtained early images represent the K1 image rather than cerebral blood flow. Consequently, the contrast in early images from amyloid PET tracers is thought to be compromised when compared to cerebral blood flow images. Method To enhance the contrast in early images obtained from amyloid PET tracers and thereby improve diagnostic accuracy, we developed a method for contrast recovery and established a methodology for determining the parameter involved in achieving this contrast recovery, drawing insights from a thorough literature review. Additionally, we conducted a comparative analysis involving PiB's early images and FDG, investigating their respective contributions. Result Our study demonstrated a strong correlation between FDG and early images of PiB, with relatively inconspicuous underestimations in high‐blood‐flow regions. Conclusion While we theoretically established a method to recover the contrast in early images, our findings suggest that amyloid PET tracers may exhibit a higher permeability‐surface area product than anticipated. This observation raises the possibility that, without correction, these tracers might inherently provide sufficient contrast.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Contrast of Early Phase Amyloid PET
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.