ACBP/DBI neutralization for the experimental treatment of fatty liver disease
Rattachement africain : fr, es, it, se, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP), also known as diazepam-binding inhibitor (DBI), is an extracellular checkpoint of autophagy. Here, we report that patients with histologically confirmed metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) or liver fibrosis exhibit elevated levels of circulating ACBP/DBI protein as compared to non-affected controls. Plasma ACBP/DBI strongly correlated with the NAFLD and FIB4 scores in patients, and these correlations were independent of age and body mass index. We studied the capacity of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) neutralizing mouse ACBP/DBI to combat active liver disease in several mouse models, in which steatohepatitis had been induced by four different protocols, namely, (i) methionine/choline-deficient diet, (ii) Western style diet (WD) alone, (iii) WD combined with the hepatotoxic agent CCl4, and (iv) a combination of CCl4 injections and oral ethanol challenge. Injections of anti-ACBP/DBI mAb attenuated histological, enzymological, metabolomic and transcriptomic signs of liver damage in these four models, hence halting or reducing the progression of non-alcoholic and alcoholic liver disease. Steatosis, inflammation, ballooning and fibrosis responded to ACBP/DBI inhibition at the preclinical level. Altogether, these findings support a causal role of ACBP/DBI in MASH and liver fibrosis, as well as the possibility to therapeutically target ACBP/DBI.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- ACBP/DBI neutralization for the experimental treatment of fatty liver disease
- Date Crossref
- 16/11/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.