Ultrack: pushing the limits of cell tracking across biological scales
Rattachement africain : us, br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Tracking live cells across 2D, 3D, and multi-channel time-lapse recordings is crucial for understanding tissue-scale biological processes. Despite advancements in imaging technology, achieving accurate cell tracking remains challenging, particularly in complex and crowded tissues where cell segmentation is often ambiguous. We present Ultrack, a versatile and scalable cell-tracking method that tackles this challenge by considering candidate segmentations derived from multiple algorithms and parameter sets. Ultrack employs temporal consistency to select optimal segments, ensuring robust performance even under segmentation uncertainty. We validate our method on diverse datasets, including terabyte-scale developmental time-lapses of zebrafish, fruit fly, and nematode embryos, as well as multi-color and label-free cellular imaging. We show that Ultrack achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Cell Tracking Challenge and demonstrates superior accuracy in tracking densely packed embryonic cells over extended periods. Moreover, we propose an approach to tracking validation via dual-channel sparse labeling that enables high-fidelity ground truth generation, pushing the boundaries of long-term cell tracking assessment. Our method is freely available as a Python package with Fiji and napari plugins and can be deployed in a high-performance computing environment, facilitating widespread adoption by the research community.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ultrack: pushing the limits of cell tracking across biological scales
- Date Crossref
- 03/09/2024
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.