Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Safety and Efficacy of Staged, Bilateral Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy in Essential Tremor

66Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
11Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Importance: Unilateral magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound ablation of ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus for essential tremor reduces tremor on 1 side, but untreated contralateral or midline symptoms remain limiting for some patients. Historically, bilateral lesioning produced unacceptable risks and was supplanted by deep brain stimulation; increasing acceptance of unilateral focused ultrasound lesioning has led to interest in a bilateral option. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of staged, bilateral focused ultrasound thalamotomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, open-label, multicenter trial treated patients with essential tremor from July 2020 to October 2021, with a 12-month follow-up, at 7 US academic medical centers. Of 62 enrolled patients who had undergone unilateral focused ultrasound thalamotomy at least 9 months prior to enrollment, 11 were excluded and 51 were treated. Eligibility criteria included patient age (22 years and older), medication refractory, tremor severity (Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor [CRST] part A score ≥2 for postural or kinetic tremor), and functional disability (CRST part C score ≥2 in any category). Intervention: A focused ultrasound system interfaced with magnetic resonance imaging allowed real-time alignment of thermography maps with anatomy. Subthreshold sonications allowed target interrogation for efficacy and off-target effects before creating an ablation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Tremor/motor score (CRST parts A and B) at 3 months for the treated side after treatment was the primary outcome measure, and secondary assessments for efficacy and safety continued to 12 months. Results: The mean (SD) population age was 73 (13.9) years, and 44 participants (86.3%) were male. The mean (SD) tremor/motor score improved from 17.4 (5.4; 95% CI, 15.9-18.9) to 6.4 (5.3; 95% CI, 4.9 to 7.9) at 3 months (66% improvement in CRST parts A and B scores; 95% CI, 59.8-72.2; P < .001). There was significant improvement in mean (SD) postural tremor (from 2.5 [0.8]; 95% CI, 2.3 to 2.7 to 0.6 [0.9]; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.8; P < .001) and mean (SD) disability score (from 10.3 [4.7]; 95% CI, 9.0-11.6 to 2.2 [2.8]; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9; P < .001). Twelve participants developed mild (study-defined) ataxia, which persisted in 6 participants at 12 months. Adverse events (159 of 188 [85%] mild, 25 of 188 [13%] moderate, and 1 severe urinary tract infection) reported most commonly included numbness/tingling (n = 17 total; n = 8 at 12 months), dysarthria (n = 15 total; n = 7 at 12 months), ataxia (n = 12 total; n = 6 at 12 months), unsteadiness/imbalance (n = 10 total; n = 0 at 12 months), and taste disturbance (n = 7 total; n = 3 at 12 months). Speech difficulty, including phonation, articulation, and dysphagia, were generally mild (rated as not clinically significant, no participants with worsening in all 3 measures) and transient. Conclusions and Relevance: Staged, bilateral focused ultrasound thalamotomy significantly reduced tremor severity and functional disability scores. Adverse events for speech, swallowing, and ataxia were mostly mild and transient. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04112381.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Safety and Efficacy of Staged, Bilateral Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy in Essential Tremor
Date Crossref
01/09/2024
Éditeur
American Medical Association (AMA)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Cornell University Department of Neurology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Neurological Surgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Weill Cornell Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Neurosurgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Maryland Department of Neurosurgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Virginia Department of Neurosurgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Stanford University Department of Radiology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Columbia University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • West Virginia University Department of Neurosurgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Pennsylvania Department of Neurosurgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • The Ohio State University Department of Neurosurgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Neurology — Cornell University, Neurological Surgery et Weill Cornell Medicine, avec 8 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Neurological disorders and treatmentsVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.