Antibody-mediated immunological memory correlates with long-term Lyme veterinary vaccine protection in mice

Le résumé fourni par la source

Lyme disease, caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most common tick-borne illness in the United States. Despite the rise in Lyme disease incidence, there is no vaccine against B. burgdorferi approved for human use. Little is known about the immune correlates of protection needed to prevent Lyme disease. In this work, a mouse model was used to characterize the immune response and compare the protection provided by two USDA-approved vaccines for use in canines: Duramune (bacterin vaccine) and Vanguard crLyme (subunit vaccine composed of two outer surface proteins, OspA and OspC). C3H/HeNCrl mice were immunized with two doses of either Duramune or Vanguard, and immune responses and protection against B. burgdorferi were assessed in short (35 days) and long-term (120 days) studies. Flow cytometry, ELISPOT detection of antibody-producing cells, and antibody affinity studies were performed to identify correlates of vaccine-mediated protection. Both vaccines induced humoral responses, with high IgG titers against B. burgdorferi. However, the levels of anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies decayed over time in Vanguard-vaccinated mice. While both vaccines triggered the production of antibodies against both OspA and OspC, antibody levels against these proteins were also lower in Vanguard-vaccinated mice 120 days post-vaccination. Both vaccines only provided partial protection against B. burgdorferi at the dose used in this model. The protection provided by Duramune was superior to Vanguard 120 days post-vaccination, and was characterized by higher antibody titers, higher abundance of long-lived plasma cells, and higher avidity antibodies than Vanguard. Overall, these studies provide insights into the importance of the humoral memory response to veterinary vaccines against Lyme disease and will help inform the development of future human vaccines.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.