Nuclear GAPDH in cortical microglia mediates cellular stress-induced cognitive inflexibility
Rattachement africain : us, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We report a mechanism that underlies stress-induced cognitive inflexibility at the molecular level. In a mouse model under subacute cellular stress in which deficits in rule shifting tasks were elicited, the nuclear glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase (N-GAPDH) cascade was activated specifically in microglia in the prelimbic cortex. The cognitive deficits were normalized with a pharmacological intervention with a compound (the RR compound) that selectively blocked the initiation of N-GAPDH cascade without affecting glycolytic activity. The normalization was also observed with a microglia-specific genetic intervention targeting the N-GAPDH cascade. At the mechanistic levels, the microglial secretion of High-Mobility Group Box (HMGB), which is known to bind with and regulate the NMDA-type glutamate receptors, was elevated. Consequently, the hyperactivation of the prelimbic layer 5 excitatory neurons, a neural substrate for cognitive inflexibility, was also observed. The upregulation of the microglial HMGB signaling and neuronal hyperactivation were normalized by the pharmacological and microglia-specific genetic interventions. Taken together, we show a pivotal role of cortical microglia and microglia-neuron interaction in stress-induced cognitive inflexibility. We underscore the N-GAPDH cascade in microglia, which causally mediates stress-induced cognitive alteration.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Nuclear GAPDH in cortical microglia mediates cellular stress-induced cognitive inflexibility
- Date Crossref
- 13/04/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.