ApoE isoform does not influence skeletal muscle regeneration in adult mice
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) has been shown to be necessary for proper skeletal muscle regeneration. Consistent with this finding, single-cell RNA-sequencing analyses of skeletal muscle stem cells (MuSCs) revealed that Apoe is a top marker of quiescent MuSCs that is downregulated upon activation. The purpose of this study was to determine if muscle regeneration is altered in mice which harbor one of the three common human ApoE isoforms, referred to as ApoE2, E3 and E4. Methods: Histomorphometric analyses were employed to assess muscle regeneration in ApoE2, E3, and E4 mice after 14 days of recovery from barium chloride-induced muscle damage in vivo, and primary MuSCs were isolated to assess proliferation and differentiation of ApoE2, E3, and E4 MuSCs in vitro. Results: There was no difference in the basal skeletal muscle phenotype of ApoE isoforms as evaluated by section area, myofiber cross-sectional area (CSA), and myonuclear and MuSC abundance per fiber. Although there were no differences in fiber-type frequency in the soleus, Type IIa relative frequency was significantly lower in plantaris muscles of ApoE4 mice compared to ApoE3. Moreover, ApoE isoform did not influence muscle regeneration as assessed by fiber frequency, fiber CSA, and myonuclear and MuSC abundance. Finally, there were no differences in the proliferative capacity or myogenic differentiation potential of MuSCs between any ApoE isoform. Discussion: Collectively, these data indicate nominal effects of ApoE isoform on the ability of skeletal muscle to regenerate following injury or the in vitro MuSC phenotype.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- ApoE isoform does not influence skeletal muscle regeneration in adult mice
- Date Crossref
- 22/11/2023
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Kentucky Center for Muscle Biology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Buck Institute for Research on Aging pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
Baylor University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College of Medicine Department of Physiology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences Department of Health pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Center for Muscle Biology — University of Kentucky, Buck Institute for Research on Aging et Baylor University, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.