Quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction in copies ml–1 linearly correlates with standard urine culture in colonies ml−1 for urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Standard urine culture (SUC) is the current standard method for confirmation of a urinary tract infection (UTI). SUC identifies microorganisms in urine samples and semi-quantifies these as colony-forming units (CFUs) ml-1. In contrast, quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction (q-MPCR) is a culture-independent assay in which the microbes are quantified by targeting genomic sequences and reported as cells ml-1, calculated from copies ml-1. Using serial dilutions within the 104-105 cells ml-1 range, the usual reporting range of SUC, this study compared the quantification results based on SUC and q-MPCR for four uropathogens with the control hemocytometer counts. The results revealed a linear relationship and a 1:1 correlation between the q-MPCR and SUC results. Additional q-MPCR quantification of 36 uropathogenic non-fastidious and fastidious bacteria and yeast indicated a reproducible linear correlation in a 1:1 manner with the control counts over a range of cell densities (103-106 cells ml-1). The results confirm that the quantifications by q-MPCR in cells ml-1 and by SUC in CFUs ml-1 are comparable and answer to the lingering question of how the results of these two methods correlate. Moreover, q-MPCR provided accurate quantification of various microorganisms over wider cell density ranges without the time required for microbial growth.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction in copies ml–1 linearly correlates with standard urine culture in colonies ml−1 for urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens
- Date Crossref
- 27/07/2023
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Pathnostics (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Precision Consulting pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Stat4ward pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Pathnostics (United States), Precision Consulting et Stat4ward.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.