Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a selective biliary cannulation technique aimed at improving the successful selective biliary cannulation rate and reducing the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of angled-tip guidewires (AGW) vs. straight-tip guidewires (SGW) for biliary cannulation via WGC by a trainee. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-center, open-labeled, randomized, and controlled trial. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study and assigned randomly to two groups (Group A to S and Group S to A). In this study, we started selective biliary cannulation via WGC with an AGW or an SGW for 7 min. If cannulation was unsuccessful, the other guidewire was used, and cannulation was continued for another 7 min (cross-over method). RESULTS: = 0.04). No significant difference was found for adverse events such as pancreatitis between the two guidewires. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that an AGW is recommended for WGC performed by a trainee.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study
- Date Crossref
- 17/04/2023
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Fukushima Medical University Department of Gastroenterology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Dokkyo Medical University Department of Gastroenterology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Minamiaizu Prefectural Hospital Department of Internal Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Department of Gastroenterology — Fukushima Medical University, Department of Gastroenterology — Dokkyo Medical University et Department of Internal Medicine — Minamiaizu Prefectural Hospital.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.