Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

International consensus conference recommendations on ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students

128Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
60Institutions déclarées
15Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, ro, ar, sa, si, es, ch, it, gb, ca, br, my, in, au, cl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to provide expert consensus recommendations to establish a global ultrasound curriculum for undergraduate medical students. METHODS: 64 multi-disciplinary ultrasound experts from 16 countries, 50 multi-disciplinary ultrasound consultants, and 21 medical students and residents contributed to these recommendations. A modified Delphi consensus method was used that included a systematic literature search, evaluation of the quality of literature by the GRADE system, and the RAND appropriateness method for panel judgment and consensus decisions. The process included four in-person international discussion sessions and two rounds of online voting. RESULTS: A total of 332 consensus conference statements in four curricular domains were considered: (1) curricular scope (4 statements), (2) curricular rationale (10 statements), (3) curricular characteristics (14 statements), and (4) curricular content (304 statements). Of these 332 statements, 145 were recommended, 126 were strongly recommended, and 61 were not recommended. Important aspects of an undergraduate ultrasound curriculum identified include curricular integration across the basic and clinical sciences and a competency and entrustable professional activity-based model. The curriculum should form the foundation of a life-long continuum of ultrasound education that prepares students for advanced training and patient care. In addition, the curriculum should complement and support the medical school curriculum as a whole with enhanced understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathophysiological processes and clinical practice without displacing other important undergraduate learning. The content of the curriculum should be appropriate for the medical student level of training, evidence and expert opinion based, and include ongoing collaborative research and development to ensure optimum educational value and patient care. CONCLUSIONS: The international consensus conference has provided the first comprehensive document of recommendations for a basic ultrasound curriculum. The document reflects the opinion of a diverse and representative group of international expert ultrasound practitioners, educators, and learners. These recommendations can standardize undergraduate medical student ultrasound education while serving as a basis for additional research in medical education and the application of ultrasound in clinical practice.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
International consensus conference recommendations on ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students
Date Crossref
27/07/2022
Éditeur
Mattioli1885
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

University of South CarolinaFoundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and ResearchPresbyterian Healthcare ServicesIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyHospital de Emergencias Dr. Clemente ÁlvarezEastern Virginia Medical SchoolUniversity Hospitals of ClevelandKing Abdulaziz Medical CityUniversity Clinical Centre MariborUniversidad Francisco de VitoriaEnte Ospedaliero CantonaleIstituto Cardiocentro TicinoUniversitat de LleidaPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity of Tennessee Health Science CenterOspedale San Luigi GonzagaUniversity of LeedsLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustMayo ClinicTexas Tech UniversityTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterThe Ohio State UniversityUniversity of California, IrvineMcGill UniversityIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNorthwell HealthHofstra UniversityThomas Jefferson UniversityUniversity of CalgaryHenry Ford HospitalOregon Health & Science UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaAbbott Northwestern HospitalHospital Sírio-LibanêsSaint Barnabas Medical CenterYale UniversityRoyal Brompton HospitalKing Fahad Specialist HospitalNew York Institute of TechnologyInstitut Penyelidikan VeterinarUniversity of South AlabamaGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustMedanta The MedicityUniversidad de Buenos AiresLoma Linda University Medical CenterLoma Linda UniversityHarvard UniversityUniversity of South AustraliaChildren's Hospital of Orange CountyCarilion ClinicVirginia TechUniversity of California, San FranciscoUniversity of ChileUniversity of FloridaFlorida CollegeThe University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science CenterUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesSalt Lake Regional Medical CenterKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CentreUniversity of Manitoba

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Ultrasound in Clinical ApplicationsRadiology practices and educationInnovations in Medical Education

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.