Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2021 article

Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

149Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
96Institutions déclarées
41Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : dk, hk, ch, us, pl, ca, gb, jp, nz, pk, hr, fi, se, mx, cz, pt, fr, be, tr, bd, sk, br, it, lt, es, au, ph, my, bg, sg, xk, de, nl, Afrique du Sud, in, at, id, Égypte, ar, il, ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. The open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers to investigate how psychological responses differ across countries and cultures, and how this has impacted behaviour, coping and trust in government efforts to slow the spread of the virus. Starting in March 2020, COVIDiSTRESS leveraged the convenience of unpaid online recruitment to generate public data. The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different government measures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments' efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others. However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey
Date Crossref
01/02/2021
Éditeur
The Royal Society
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Aarhus UniversityEducation University of Hong KongUniversity of BernUniversity of AlabamaUniversity of WrocławInstitute of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoKing's College LondonKing's College SchoolColorado State UniversityInternational Christian UniversityKeele UniversityUniversity of WaikatoKyushu UniversityBahria UniversityCatholic University of CroatiaUniversity of SheffieldUniversity of St. Thomas - TexasNortheastern UniversityUniversity of TurkuUniversity of SkövdeFinland UniversityInstituto Nacional de Neurología y NeurocirugíaMasaryk UniversityUniversidade do PortoUniversité Paris NanterreVrije Universiteit BrusselUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasTOBB University of Economics and TechnologyUniwersytet SWPSUniversity of DhakaMcGill UniversityMichigan State UniversityMiddle East Technical UniversityUniversity of WarsawUniversidad VeracruzanaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoUniversity of OregonUniversity of Pavol Jozef ŠafárikPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroTexas A&M International UniversityUniversity of Milano-BicoccaUniversity of ChittagongKaunas University of TechnologyLyon 1 UniversitéCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc JeannerodInstitut des Sciences CognitivesUniversidad de GranadaBrown UniversityUniversity of EssexUniversity of NorthamptonMendel University in BrnoThe University of MelbourneUniversidad Autónoma MetropolitanaDe La Salle UniversityGriffith UniversityUniversity of MalayaAnkara Yıldırım Beyazıt UniversityUniversity of SalfordUniversité Paris-SaclayUniversity of KentSofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"INSEADUniversity of CambridgeUniversity Clinical Center of KosovoLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenTilburg UniversitySefako Makgatho Health Sciences UniversityIndian Institute of Technology IndoreIndian Institute of Technology HyderabadSaarland UniversityVrije Universiteit AmsterdamLeibniz-Institut für WissensmedienUniversity of ŁódźUniversity of WarwickUniversity of ZagrebFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in ZagrebThe University of Texas at AustinUniversity of ViennaSebelas Maret UniversityUNSW SydneyGhent UniversityUniversity of CanberraCairo UniversityConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasUniversidad Nacional de CórdobaUniversidad de Buenos AiresHebrew University of JerusalemCalifornia State University, NorthridgeOpen University of the NetherlandsTampere UniversityUniversity of HelsinkiSociety of Swedish Literature in FinlandUniversity of BirminghamNational Research University Higher School of Economics

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

COVID-19 and Mental HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.