Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2021 article

ECMO for COVID-19 patients in Europe and Israel

127Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
52Institutions déclarées
12Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : nl, fr, cz, be, de, pt, lt, it, gb, au, ch, ps. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

As of October 17th the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) caused a pandemic disease (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) 40 million people worldwide, with almost one million deaths [1]. Although most patients have an uncomplicated clinical course, the more severe forms of COVID-19 require hospitalization and intensive care unit admission [2]. Conventional high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive and/or invasive mechanical ventilation, often in combination with pronepositioning, have all been reported to be effective in the majority of patients [2]. However, in severe cases, life-threatening, refractory hypoxemia may occur [2]. Secondary infections, myocardial disease involvement and a hypercoaguable state with/without pulmonary embolism may also contribute to the complexity of treating these critically ill patients [3–5]. In such cases rescue therapy may be required. The World Health Organization (WHO) [6], the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (www.elso.org) and others have advocated the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients with severe cardiorespiratory failure. Few patients in China received ECMO support in the early phase of the pandemic and the mortality rate among these patients was high [7]. Initial experience with COVID-19 in Europe was similar as the high number of critically ill patients disrupted usual care pathways and stretched hospital resources [2]. There was probably some hesitation to provide a form of support which is considered highly resource consuming. However, despite the rapid growth in the number of critically ill COVID-19 patients in Europe, over time an unexpectedly high number of severely compromised patients were considered eligible for ECMO support. At this time the Steering Committee of the European chapter of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (Euro-ELSO) initiated prospective data collection among European and Israeli centres with the intention of providing near real-time information on ECMO use in COVID-19. The study was approved by the Maastricht University Ethical Committee (coordinating center) and is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04366921. Data are collected weekly and reported anonymously through the Euro-ELSO website https://www.euroelso.net/covid-19/covid-19-survey/. This voluntary study includes basic data on patients ́ age and gender, the details of their ECMO treatment and real-time status (i.e., ongoing, successfully weaned, or died). Since March 15th, 2020, 177 centres from Europe and Israel have joined the study, routinely reporting on the ECMO support they provide to COVID-19 patients. The mean annual number of cases treated with ECMO in the participating centres before the pandemic (2019) was 55. The number of COVID-19 patients has increased rapidly each week reaching 1531 treated patients as of September 14th. The greatest number of cases has been reported from France (n = 385), UK (n = 193), Germany (n = 176), Spain (n = 166), and Italy (n = 136) (See Supplementary Fig. 1). The mean age of treated patients was 52.6 years (range 16–80), 79% were male. The ECMO configuration used was VV in 91% of cases, VA in 5% and other in 4%. The mean PaO2 before ECMO implantation was 65 mmHg. The mean duration of ECMO support thus far has been 18 days and the mean ICU length of stay of these patients was 33 days. As of the 14th September, overall 841 patients have been weaned from ECMO support, 601 died during ECMO support, 71 died after withdrawal of ECMO, 79 are still receiving ECMO support and for 10 patients status n.a. (Fig. 1).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
ECMO for COVID-19 patients in Europe and Israel
Date Crossref
09/01/2021
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Maastricht University Medical CentreMaastricht UniversitySorbonne UniversitéAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de ParisPitié-Salpêtrière HospitalCharles UniversityGeneral University Hospital in PragueUniversitair Ziekenhuis LeuvenErasmus MCErasmus University RotterdamUniversity Medical Center UtrechtParacelsus Medizinische PrivatuniversitätLeiden University Medical CenterRadboud University NijmegenRadboud University Medical CenterUniversity Hospital RegensburgLeipzig Heart InstituteUniversity of RegensburgHospital de São JoãoHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfWest German Heart and Vascular Center EssenMedizinische Hochschule HannoverUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad KrozingenUniversity of FreiburgEssen University HospitalUniversity Medical Center FreiburgUniversity of Education FreiburgUniversity Children's Hospital TübingenUniversity of TübingenUniversity of KasselGoethe University FrankfurtUniversity Hospital FrankfurtRWTH Aachen UniversityLungenklinik Köln-MerheimVilnius University Hospital Santariskiu KlinikosOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIIIAsklepios Klinik LangenIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'OrsolaAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano NiguardaLaboratoire d’Imagerie BiomédicaleCentre de Recherche en Acquisition et Traitement de l'Image pour la SantéUniversity of ParmaOspedale di ParmaGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustIntensive Care FoundationPoliclinico San Matteo FondazioneBarts Health NHS TrustUniversity Hospital ZurichBerlin Heart (Germany)Birmingham Children's HospitalHebron UniversityNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Mechanical Circulatory Support DevicesIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.