A two-stage deep learning pipeline for automated detection and localization of endotracheal tubes on pediatric chest radiographs: a pilot study

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are critical life-support devices for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients, yet automated ETT assessment on pediatric chest radiographs (CXRs) remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a two-stage deep learning pipeline for automated detection and localization of ETTs on pediatric CXRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 1,000 pediatric CXRs (476 ETT-positive, 524 ETT-negative) acquired in 2021 at a single institution. ETT segmentation masks and distal tip coordinates were annotated by trained analysts and verified by pediatric radiologists. A two-stage pipeline consisting of a ResNet classification model followed by a U-Net segmentation model was developed for ETT detection and localization. Performance was evaluated on a held-out test set using multiple metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the mean absolute error (MAE), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Inter-observer variability was assessed as a reference for localization performance. RESULTS: Inter-observer variability for ETT tip localization was 2.01 mm MAE on the held-out test set. The pipeline achieved an AUROC of 0.994 (95% CI 0.986, 1.000) for ETT detection. For localization, the pipeline achieved a MAE of 6.59 mm (95% CI 5.19, 8.21 mm). Incorporating the classification stage substantially reduced false-positive segmentations from 17 to 3 among ETT-negative CXRs compared with the standalone segmentation model. CONCLUSION: A two-stage deep learning pipeline demonstrated high performance for automated ETT detection and promising performance for tip localization on pediatric CXRs in this single-center pilot study. Further evaluation in larger and external pediatric cohorts is needed to assess generalizability.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.