Humor in organizational dynamics: affiliative and aggressive humor, creativity and constructive voice
Rattachement africain : tw, hk, mo. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract This study examines how employees’ perceptions of affiliative and aggressive humor influence creativity and constructive voice in organizational settings. We propose that affiliative humor fosters a supportive work environment for employees with higher liking of humorous situations, thereby enhancing creative thinking and encouraging proactive communication. In contrast, aggressive humor is expected to undermine these outcomes. To test our model, we collected 228 self-reported survey data in three waves from employees in Taiwan, ensuring temporal precedence and minimizing common method bias. Findings reveal that affiliative humor is positively associated with constructive voice, with creativity conditionally mediating this relationship. Liking of humorous situations moderates the positive effects of affiliative humor, such that individuals with higher liking of humorous situations exhibit a stronger relationship between affiliative humor, creativity, and constructive voice. Surprisingly, the anticipated negative effects of aggressive humor on creativity and constructive voice were not supported. These results incorporate mediating and moderating processes, offer a more detailed understanding of how humor impacts workplace behaviors and contribute to both theory and practice by clarifying the role of individual differences in humor perception.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Humor in organizational dynamics: affiliative and aggressive humor, creativity and constructive voice
- Date Crossref
- 07/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.