Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Feasibility of a Stool State Check App Using AI During Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Multicenter Prospective Study (SCAN Study)

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
11Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Optimal bowel preparation (BP) is crucial for a successful colonoscopy. Although multiple factors influence BP quality, including patient adherence to laxatives and dietary instructions, the stool state during BP should be properly evaluated to perform a colonoscopy of sufficient quality. Therefore, we developed a smartphone app to evaluate a patient's stool state during BP and a viewer to enable real-time monitoring by medical staff. Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of performing colonoscopies of appropriate quality using the app-and-viewer system. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between November 2022 and December 2023, involving patients scheduled for colonoscopy at 10 Japanese institutions, comprising 6 tertiary hospitals, 3 regional general hospitals, and 1 community-based clinic. Patients who (1) underwent a colonoscopy at participating institutions, (2) were aged between 20 and 70 years, and (3) owned smartphones compatible with Android or iOS were included in the study. The patients downloaded the app on their smartphones and captured images of their stools during BP, while the medical staff reviewed the evaluation of the stools by the app via the viewer system. The primary end point was defined as the proportion of patients with a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score of ≥6 among those who successfully used the app. Secondary end points included mean BBPS score, rate of an excellent BBPS score (≥8), adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, and withdrawal time in negative colonoscopy. Additionally, we evaluated the usability of the app, medical staff workload burden with the app, and viewer usage via questionnaire surveys. Results: A total of 343 patients were enrolled, and 326 were ultimately included in the analysis. Overall, 99.1% (323/326, 95% CI 97.3%-99.8%) of the patients achieved the primary end point. The mean BBPS score was 8.5 (SD 1.0), and the proportion of excellent BBPS scores was 87.4% (285/326). The adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, and mean withdrawal time in negative colonoscopy were 46.9% (153/326, 95% CI 41.4%-52.5%), 99.7% (325/326, 95% CI 98.3%-99.9%), and 10.7 (SD 5.9) minutes, respectively. In the questionnaire survey, 98.5% (321/326) of the patients reported that the tutorial was easy to understand, 96.0% (313/326) found stool image capture easy, and 87.8% (286/326) reported reduced anxiety regarding BP. Furthermore, 90.5% (295/326) of the patients indicated that they would like to use the app again for future colonoscopies. Among medical staff, 92.5% (62/67) considered the viewer system necessary, 89.6% (60/67) found it easy to use, and 89.6% (60/67) reported a reduction in workload burden. Conclusions: AI-based stool state assessment using the app and the viewer during BP was feasible across diverse BP methods and clinical environments. Favorable BP outcomes and high usability among patients and medical staff support the potential use of this approach in real-world colonoscopy practice.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Feasibility of a Stool State Check App Using AI During Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Multicenter Prospective Study (SCAN Study)
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
JMIR Publications Inc.
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • National Cancer Center Hospital East Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Saku Central Hospital Department of Gastroenterology pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Ono Clinic pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Gunma University Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Saitama Cancer Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • SHOWA Medical University Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Toho University Department of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Toho University Omori Medical Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Aizawa Hospital Department of Gastrointestinal Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Jikei University Kashiwa hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of Tokyo Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Kon Internal Medicine Clinic pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé

Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy — National Cancer Center Hospital East, Department of Gastroenterology — Saku Central Hospital et Ono Clinic, avec 9 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionDiverticular Disease and ComplicationsStoma care and complications

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.