Prevention of recurrence of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to comprehensively analyze the effectiveness of different postoperative interventions for Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) recurrence prevention. Literature searching was performed to select eligible studies published prior to March 11, 2026 in PubMed, Cochrane and Embase. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving interventions for IUA prevention after transcervical resection of adhesions (TCRA) were included. Outcomes included IUA recurrence rate, AFS score reduction, AFS score and clinical pregnancy rate. Twenty‑six studies (3040 patients) were included. Intrauterine estrogen releasing system showed the highest probability of being the best intervention for IUA recurrence rate (SUCRA: 95.40%) and was superior to IUD (OR for IUD vs. system = 5.35, 95% CI 1.08–26.50). PRF showed the highest probability of being the best intervention for clinical pregnancy rate (SUCRA: 85.42%) and was superior to control (OR for control vs. PRF = 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.83) and IUD (OR for IUD vs. PRF = 0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.80). IUD + balloon ranked highest for AFS reduction (SUCRA: 98.68%), while PRP + balloon ranked highest for AFS score (SUCRA: 85.82%). Substantial heterogeneity was observed for both AFS reduction (I 2 = 90%) and AFS score (I 2 = 99.6%), warranting cautious interpretation. No publication bias was detected. Intrauterine estrogen‑releasing system and IUD + balloon showed promising results for IUA recurrence, while PRF showed potential efficacy for postoperative pregnancy rate, and PRP + Balloon demonstrated the most consistent efficacy across all outcomes. Given substantial heterogeneity and limited evidence, these findings should be considered exploratory and interpreted with caution.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevention of recurrence of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Date Crossref
- 29/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Chinese PLA General Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
General Hospital of Chinese PLA pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Chinese PLA General Hospital, PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center et General Hospital of Chinese PLA.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.