Evaluation of AI Chatbot Responses to Pediatric Urology Frequently Asked Questions

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of responses from 4 publicly available LLMs (ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.7, Gemini 2.5, and Copilot) to frequently asked questions (FAQs) in pediatric urology. METHODS: FAQs were generated using standardized prompts and submitted to each LLM using parent-centered instructions. Two board-certified pediatric urologists independently rated responses across 7 domains as follows: accuracy, completeness, safety, clarity, actionability, conciseness, and Global Quality Score using a 5-point Likert scale. Emotional tone was analyzed using the NRC Word-Emotion Association Lexicon, and readability was assessed using 7 established metrics. RESULTS: All LLMs produced generally high expert ratings for accuracy (mean 4.27), safety (4.36), and clarity (4.42). Claude achieved the highest overall quality score (4.35), followed by Gemini (4.03), ChatGPT (4.00), and Copilot (3.80). Emotional tone was predominantly positive and supportive across models. Reading corresponded to an 11th-15th grade reading level, exceeding the recommended 6th-8th grade patient-education standards. CONCLUSION: LLMs can provide accurate, safe, and supportive information for parents, but their usefulness is limited by gaps in completeness and high readability levels. Claude achieved the highest overall quality, whereas ChatGPT demonstrated high safety with lower completeness. Future development would prioritize plain-language optimization, context-aware emotional framing, and parent co-design to improve comprehension.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.