NUP153 immunoreactivity in neuroendocrine neoplasms supports the diagnosis of NET versus NEC and is modulated by post‐translational modifications

Le résumé fourni par la source

Nucleoporins (NUPs) constitute the nuclear pore complex (NPC) and are essentially involved in nuclear transport, chromatin organization, and context-dependent gene regulation. However, the role of NUPs in neuroendocrine (tumor)biology and related diagnostic potential is poorly defined. In this study, we comparatively analyzed immunohistochemical expression patterns of NUP98 and NUP153 (sharing structural and functional similarities) across a large variety of human tissues and tumors (total N > 600), with a focus on neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs (n = 361)). While both NUPs showed a nuclear rim accentuated staining pattern, NUP98 exhibited ubiquitous and NUP153 a striking cell- and tissue/tumor-type-dependent immunoreactivity. More specifically, NUP153 immunoreactivity was consistently detectable in neuroendocrine tissues (e.g., pancreatic islets) and retained in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the pancreas, lung, appendix, and small intestine, but almost completely absent in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and non-neuroendocrine carcinomas. Loss of NUP153 staining correlated with poorer clinical outcomes in pancreatic NETs. Further analyses revealed that NUP153 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and total protein levels were not significantly different between NETs and non-neuroendocrine carcinomas, as evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and targeted proteomics. Differential isoform usage was ruled out by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing as another possible explanation for the discriminative immunohistochemical findings. Finally, a high density of post-translational modifications (PTMs) within the antigen sequence could be discovered and indicated PTM-dependent detection as the likely cause of differential staining. Collectively, our findings suggest that NUP153 is a differentiation-dependent and PTM-sensitive immunohistochemical marker in NENs with diagnostic and prognostic potential. It also emphasizes the importance of orthogonal molecular analyses for correct interpretation of IHC stainings.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.