Bridging the Diagnostic Gap: Reviewing Current Endometriosis Screening Tools and Models
Rattachement africain : Afrique du Sud. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Endometriosis affects 10% of reproductive-aged women globally and is one of the major causes of infertility. It is a debilitating, chronic condition with an average diagnostic delay of up to 10 years. This is partly due to the lack of noninvasive tools to diagnose the disease, leading to disease progression and poor health-related outcomes. Aim: The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize the available literature on the existing tools, their use and applicability, and identify current gaps in the field. Method: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify applicable studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Results: Eighteen studies were included in the review, with screening tools classified into four categories: questionnaire-based, app-based, machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI)–driven, and subtype-focused models. Among the included study tools, 14 reported on psychometric parameters with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values ranging from 0.77 to 0.95, with machine learning and AI-driven models reporting the highest accuracy metrics. Conclusion: Significant gaps were noted across identified tools, particularly in external validation, comprehensive psychometric evaluation, and cultural adaptation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Bridging the Diagnostic Gap: Reviewing Current Endometriosis Screening Tools and Models
- Date Crossref
- 11/08/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of the Witwatersrand University of the Witwatersrand, Afrique du Sud (code pays fourni par la source)Université ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Health Sciences Division of Clinical Pharmacy University of the Witwatersrand, Afrique du Sud (pays nommé en fin d’affiliation)Université ou école supérieure
University of the Witwatersrand (University of the Witwatersrand, Afrique du Sud) et Division of Clinical Pharmacy — Faculty of Health Sciences (University of the Witwatersrand, Afrique du Sud). Pays d’affiliation : Afrique du Sud.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.