Wastewater-Based Epidemiology of Sexually Transmitted Pathogens Across Scales
Rattachement africain : us, in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Wastewater-based epidemiology for sexually transmitted pathogens Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonorrhea), and Treponema pallidum (syphilis) is sparse compared to viral targets despite their public health significance. We used multiplex, digital PCR to characterize C. trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and T. pallidum across multiple sewersheds and neighborhoods in Washington State, USA. We examined wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) influent from sewersheds that serve populations from less than 5000 people to over 100,000 people. To capture higher spatial resolution, we also sampled six neighborhoods within the city of Seattle. The most abundant pathogen, C. trachomatis was detected in 42–88% of samples across WWTP influent sites and between 13 and 80% of samples across Seattle neighborhoods. The concentration of C. trachomatis was highest in the smallest WWTP and neighborhood that contained a college campus. We observed potential underreporting of chlamydia cases across Seattle neighborhoods when comparing wastewater concentrations to case data. N. gonorrhoeae (NG) and T. pallidum (TP) were detected in few WWTP or neighborhood samples (NG 0–11% and TP 0–18% of WWTPs and neighborhood samples). We recommend considering the temporality of disease, disease burden, and demographics when identifying suitable sewersheds to monitor for STIs to maximize public health actionability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Wastewater-Based Epidemiology of Sexually Transmitted Pathogens Across Scales
- Date Crossref
- 07/08/2026
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.