Comparisons of Continuous Positive Airway Pressures Determined by Conventional Manual Titration in a Sleep Center, During Sleep Endoscopy, and Auto-Titration at Home
Rattachement africain : tw, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
IMPORTANCE: Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) could be valuable to determine an appropriate therapeutic pressure for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). OBJECTIVE: The continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) determined by DISE was regarded as equal to the conventional titrating pressure. There is no study comparing the DISE-titrating pressure and the home-based automatic CPAP (APAP) titrating pressure. This study compared the DISE-titrating pressure, conventional titrating pressure, and home-based APAP titrating pressure. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted in a single medical center in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 59 participants with OSA who had 3 titrating pressures determined by DISE, conventional titration and home-based APAP titration were analyzed.Interventions or Exposures:Therapeutic CPAP pressure was determined by 3 methods: DISE, conventional titration, and home-based APAP titration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Home-based APAP titrating pressure was determined as 90% to 95% of APAP used at home for 2 weeks. The DISE-titrating pressure was determined manually based on direct visualization of upper airway patency during DISE examination. The conventional titrating pressure was determined manually under polysomnography (PSG) guidance in a sleep center. The correlation and difference between these 3 pressures were analyzed. RESULTS: O, respectively. Good reliability was observed in pairs between all 3 pressures. The DISE-titrating pressure and the conventional titrating pressure were lower than the home-based APAP titrating pressure. There was no difference between the DISE-titrating pressure and the conventional titrating pressure. CONCLUSIONS: DISE could help provide a therapeutic CPAP pressure similar to the conventional titrating pressure in sleep center and APAP titrating pressure at home. RELEVANCE: DISE could be a valuable alternative titrating method, especially in countries where PSG is expensive, time-consuming and difficult to access, and could facilitate earlier and more effective management of patients with OSA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparisons of Continuous Positive Airway Pressures Determined by Conventional Manual Titration in a Sleep Center, During Sleep Endoscopy, and Auto-Titration at Home
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Tzu Chi University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital Department of Internal Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
School of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
Tzu Chi University, Department of Internal Medicine — Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital et Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.