Integrating Fragment Screening and Covalent Chemistry to Drug DNA-Binding Proteins: RAD52 as a Case Study
Rattachement africain : ch, cn, gb, il. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Protein-DNA interfaces are central to genome maintenance but remain challenging targets for small-molecule discovery because they are often broad, polar, solvent exposed, and lack classical druggable pockets. Here, we establish a structure-guided strategy to chemically target such interfaces by combining fragment-based identification of DNA-mimetic binders with covalent capture of a proximal nucleophilic residue. Using the ssDNA-binding groove of RAD52 as a representative model system, an X-ray fragment screen identified carboxylate-containing fragments that recapitulate key phosphate-backbone interactions of ssDNA within the conserved DNA-binding groove. Structural analysis revealed a recurrent 2:1 fragment-binding mode that enabled fragment linking and preorganization, yielding reversible inhibitors with nanomolar biochemical activity. Subsequent exploitation of C64, located adjacent to the bound ligand, converted this reversible scaffold into potent covalent inhibitors. Optimization led to the identification of FORX-864, a beyond-rule-of-5 covalent RAD52 chemical probe with low-nanomolar ssDNA-displacement activity, efficient covalent target engagement, favorable in vitro properties, and submicromolar inhibition of RAD52-dependent single-strand annealing in cells. This work provides a chemical strategy for targeting DNA-binding proteins through DNA-mimetic fragment
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Integrating Fragment Screening and Covalent Chemistry to Drug DNA-Binding Proteins: RAD52 as a Case Study
- Date Crossref
- 23/07/2026
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.