Absence of Resilience in Acute Care: Latent Distress Profiles and Systemic Tipping Points at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Tanzania
Rattachement africain : Tanzanie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Traditional occupational health models rely on simple binary classifications “burned out” versus “healthy” that mask the transitional phases of distress through which clinicians pass before reaching complete collapse. In resource-constrained acute care environments across sub-Saharan Africa, severe emotional exhaustion often represents a systemic baseline rather than an individual anomaly. This study moves beyond the burnout binary to identify multi-dimensional latent distress profiles and model the specific tipping points and biological pathways that drive overextended but empathy-preserved clinicians into complete clinical burnout. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional dataset (N=135) capturing emergency medicine, anesthesia, and intensive care clinicians at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), we categorized clinicians into five mutually exclusive latent profiles. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent tipping points for progression from isolated exhaustion to full burnout. Mediation analysis (Hayes PROCESS Macro, Model 4) examined the pathway through which extended shifts associate with burnout. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences Research and Publication Committee (Ref. No. MUHAS-REC-6-2020-290), and all participants provided written informed consent. Results Among 135 clinicians, 62.2% (n=84) met criteria for Fully Burned Out (high exhaustion, high cynicism, low personal accomplishment), 28.1% (n=38) were Overextended (isolated high exhaustion with preserved empathy and efficacy), and 9.6% (n=13) experienced Disengaged/Moderate Strain . Notably, 0.0% (n=0) met the criteria for the Resilient/Engaged profile. Within the exhausted cohort (n=122), multivariable modeling identified shift durations exceeding 12 hours (AOR 8.72, 95% CI [1.24, 61.15], p=0.012), poor coworker relationships (AOR 4.11, 95% CI [1.42, 11.90], p=0.009), sleep deprivation under 6 hours (AOR 4.25, 95% CI [1.74, 10.40], p=0.001), and lack of regular exercise (AOR 3.10, 95% CI [1.25, 7.68], p=0.015) as independent tipping points of collapse. Mediation analysis demonstrated that the link between extended shifts and burnout was fully mediated by sleep degradation (indirect effect ab=0.264, 95% CI [0.114, 0.458]). Conclusions In low-resource acute care settings, emotional exhaustion is a universal baseline (90.4%) driven by severe systemic constraints rather than a failure of individual grit. The complete absence of a resilient cohort challenges the prevailing individual-level resilience paradigm. Drawing on the African philosophy of Ubuntu “I am because we are” this study demonstrates that collective team solidarity serves as the single strongest protective buffer against clinical collapse. Preventing clinical collapse requires structural policy shifts: capping shifts at 12 hours to protect biological rest, actively cultivating team solidarity as a workplace safety net, and investing in cadre-specific interventions that recognize the distinct vulnerabilities of nursing staff and trainees, who bear 80.9% of the burnout burden despite comprising 73.4% of the workforce.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Absence of Resilience in Acute Care: Latent Distress Profiles and Systemic Tipping Points at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Tanzania
- Date Crossref
- 22/07/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.