Immune organization defines adaptive immune competence and clinical outcome in breast cancer
Rattachement africain : es, us, cl, ps. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Summary Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are widely used to assess antitumor immunity in breast cancer but may not reflect the functional competence of adaptive immune responses. We show that immune organization, reflected by tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) and coordinated humoral and cellular immune programs, represents a distinct dimension of tumor immunity beyond lymphocyte abundance. By integrating histologic, transcriptomic, spatial, and immune receptor profiling analyses across multiple breast cancer cohorts, we show that immune organization is associated with greater immune repertoire diversity, evidence of therapy-induced clonal selection, and improved clinical outcomes, independent of immune infiltration. Transcriptomic measures of immune organization retained independent prognostic value across external cohorts, whereas measures of immune infiltration did not. Furthermore, treatment-induced increases in immune organization, but not immune infiltration, were associated with therapeutic response. These findings identify immune organization as a dynamic and clinically measurable state of adaptive antitumor immunity with implications for prognosis, treatment monitoring, and therapeutic development in breast cancer. One Sentence Summary Spatially organized immune responses, rather than lymphocyte abundance alone, define clinically relevant antitumor immunity in breast cancer.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Immune organization defines adaptive immune competence and clinical outcome in breast cancer
- Date Crossref
- 20/07/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.