Postmortem brain MRI reveals differential associations of subcortical and limbic volumes with cortical thinning and neurodegenerative pathologies
Résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: The impact of different neuropathologies on deep brain structures remains to be understood. We examine subcortical and limbic volumetry in neurodegenerative diseases involving phosphorylated tau (p-tau), α-synuclein, and transactive response DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43). METHODS: We acquired neuropathological measures and brain segmentations from postmortem analysis of 132 donors with Alzheimer's disease (AD), Lewy body disease (LBD), frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 (FTLD-TDP), and FTLD-tau. RESULTS: LBD had the least subcortical, limbic, and cortical atrophy compared to AD, FTLD-TDP, and FTLD-tau. In donors with both AD and LBD pathologies, primary LBD was associated with less atrophy than primary AD. While AD had cortico-subcortical and cortico-limbic morphometric associations, LBD had more limited parieto-occipital cortico-limbic associations. FTLD-TDP had cortico-subcortical while FTLD-tau had cortico-subcortical and cortico-limbic associations. In AD and FTLD-tau, hippocampal volumes correlated with p-tau burden, neuron loss, and gliosis. In LBD, thalamic α-synuclein severity was associated with subcortical/limbic volumes. DISCUSSION: Postmortem neuroimaging reveals disease- and region-specific structure-pathology relationships.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- <i>Postmortem</i> brain MRI reveals differential associations of subcortical and limbic volumes with cortical thinning and neurodegenerative pathologies
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.