Anesthesiologists in China: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of working conditions, clinical practice, and career challenges
Rattachement africain : cn, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Anesthesiologists play a critical role in healthcare system, yet the overall working conditions of anesthesiologists in China remain unclear. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive national assessment of this workforce. Methods: An open nationwide, cross-sectional, non-probability sampling survey focusing on working conditions, clinical practice and career challenges of anesthesiologists across China was conducted by Chinese Society of Anesthesiology from June 2022 to February 2023. The questionnaire was distributed via WeChat online platform to anesthesiology practitioners across all healthcare tiers and diverse regions of mainland China. Data were analyzed and visualized using R software. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with resignation intention. Results: A total of 30,255 participants from 5,808 medical institutions were included in the analysis, with females accounting for 47.28%. Overall, 16.29% of participants reported resignation intention. Regression analyses identified significant associations between resignation intention and service years, weekly work hours, daily anesthesia caseload, annual income, sleep quality, smoking, alcohol, and exercise frequency. A majority (62.72%) participants reported weekly meaningful work accomplishment, while 50.4% reported weekly work overload, and 30.1% experienced weekly work-induced exhaustion. In addition, 82.12% of participants never treated patients with indifference. Overall, 56.27% reported job satisfaction. Chinese anesthesiologists exhibited high self-reported clinical quality and efficacy, with low rate of adverse events (2.99%). Medical disputes (7.44%) and physical violence (4.91%) were rare, while 35.32% reported experiencing verbal violence from patients. The primary barrier to professional title promotion was paper publication (62.81%). Conclusion: Despite demonstrating high clinical quality and professional fulfillment, Chinese anesthesiologists face substantial challenges including heavy workloads, occupational burnout, and career advancement barriers. These findings provide critical insights for targeted interventions and inform evidence-based policy-making to ensure a sustainable, high-quality anesthesia workforce in China.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Anesthesiologists in China: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of working conditions, clinical practice, and career challenges
- Date Crossref
- 03/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Chinese PLA General Hospital Department of Anesthesiology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Nankai University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Peking Union Medical College Hospital Department of Anesthesiology pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
National Clinical Research pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Department of the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
School of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Anesthesiology — Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention et Nankai University, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.