Analysis of homeostatic biomechanical thresholds in a left ventricular model of growth and remodelling
Rattachement africain : cn, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Biomechanical models of myocardial growth and remodelling (G&R) are often modelled as responses to deviations from a preferred biomechanical homeostatic state, triggered by stretch or stress. Yet how these critical values of stretch and stress should be defined remains unresolved. This study examines how different homeostatic threshold definitions influence predicted left ventricular G&R. Myocardial growth was implemented using an updated-reference constrained mixture framework, with eccentric growth driven by diastolic myofibre stretch and concentric growth driven by systolic active stress. Homeostatic thresholds were derived from the baseline LV dynamics. Our results demonstrate that the choice of critical homeostatic thresholds plays an important role in triggering cardiac G&R. For volume overload, the mean and 50th percentile end-diastolic myofibre stretch show the potential to approach a preferred mechanical state with preserved cardiac pump function. For pressure overload, a 90th percentile threshold of peak active stress appears to normalise systolic stress to baseline levels with sufficient cardiac output. Localised thresholds generally lead to more heterogeneous growth patterns and potentially high stretch/stress concentrations. These findings highlight the importance of defining homeostatic targets as tissue-level quantities and provide practical guidance to improve cardiac G&R modelling.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Analysis of homeostatic biomechanical thresholds in a left ventricular model of growth and remodelling
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.