Data from Multiomic and Longitudinal Dissection of Immune Dynamics Associated with Parkinsonism after Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Therapy
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract We report a fatal case of parkinsonism following treatment with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel). To investigate underlying mechanisms, we performed a multipronged longitudinal analysis using single-cell RNA (scRNA)/T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, flow cytometry, and cytokine measurements including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood (PB) samples, spanning more than 6 months after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Combined clinical and molecular findings revealed a biphasic immunologic process in the CSF. The early phase was characterized by a selective influx of predominantly CD4+ CAR T cells, accompanied by the evidence of endothelial dysfunction, prior to the clinical manifestation of parkinsonism. A second phase was preceded by a locally restricted inflammatory process in the CSF. Subsequently, an increase in the CSF to serum albumin ratio indicated disruption of the blood–brain barrier, coinciding with a pronounced influx of T cells—primarily CAR T cells but also clonally expanded, cytotoxic CD8+ non-CAR T cells—which was associated with neuronal injury and clinical decline. Significance: This article examines central nervous system immune dynamics in a patient developing parkinsonism after cilta-cel. A longitudinal real-world dataset of CSF (n = 8) and PB (n = 6) from six matched time points was analyzed using scRNA/TCR sequencing over 6 months, capturing disease onset and progression.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Data from Multiomic and Longitudinal Dissection of Immune Dynamics Associated with Parkinsonism after Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Therapy
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.