Disruption of efflux activity reduces biofilm formation through multiple pathways

Le résumé fourni par la source

Free-swimming bacteria must undergo large-scale changes in gene expression to form structured, aggregated biofilm communities. These regulatory changes are susceptible to environmental stimuli such as exposure to antimicrobials, which can affect adhesion, biofilm matrix production, pathogenicity and multidrug susceptibility. Previously, we found that genetic or chemical inactivation of efflux activity in Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium disrupts biofilm formation with a wide range of pathways sensitive to efflux inhibition, including reduced expression of csgD , a major regulator of biofilm matrix production. How the regulatory networks controlling efflux activity and biofilm formation overlap and how perturbing efflux impacts biofilm formation is still unclear. To address this, we used a combination of directed evolution experiments and large-scale functional genomics screens (TraDIS- Xpress ) to identify the genes and pathways affecting efflux activity and biofilm formation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and E. coli . This work describes the landscape of pathways linking efflux activity and biofilm formation. Whilst no singular gene or pathway was found to control the link between the two phenotypes, we propose changes in membrane potential following efflux inactivation are sensed through multiple response regulators that each in turn contribute to repression of biofilm development. These include the two-component signal transduction system EnvZ-OmpR and AraC/XylS family transcriptional regulators, RamA and MarA, which have extensive overlapping regulons and demonstrate high degrees of functional redundancy. This work deepens our understanding of the regulatory networks governing efflux activity and biofilm formation in Enterobacteriaceae and highlights the level of overlapping regulation and functional redundancy between them.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.