Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 preprint

Postal sputum samples for clinical and research applications in chronic lung infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : fr, gb, nl, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction Postal sputum sampling represents a potential strategy for patient-led, efficient, and regular sampling, yet little is known about the validity of posting samples for clinical and research purposes in bronchiectasis. This study aimed to validate postal sputum sampling for clinical and research applications in chronic P. aeruginosa infection. Methods Sputum was collected from 12 participants with bronchiectasis and known P. aeruginosa infection. Each sputum sample was divided into four aliquots: two were sent immediately for analysis with or without ‘DNA-Shield’ (shield-fresh and non-shield-Fresh), while two were transported through the UK postal service, with or without ‘DNA-Shield’ (shield-posted and non-shield-posted). All aliquots were sent at ambient temperature and subsequently processed for bacterial enumeration through selective culture, detailed antimicrobial susceptibility testing, quantitative PCR (qPCR), 16S microbiome sequencing, metabolomics, and proteomics. Results During postage, there was a median of four days (range, 2-7) between sample collection and processing. 7/12 patients were positive for P. aeruginosa by culture of fresh samples, with 100% agreement in posted samples. Postage did not affect cultured (p=0.81) or amplified load of P. aeruginosa (p=0.94), and no differences were observed in AST profiles across 140 isolates for P. aeruginosa cultured from fresh or posted samples. Metabolomics and proteomics revealed that variation between individuals was significantly greater than between fresh and posted samples, and no significant differences in microbial taxa were observed between samples. No differences were associated with the addition of DNA Shield by qPCR (p=0.19), however, freeze-thaw from -80°C increased amplified load (p=<0.01). Conclusions We found little evidence of an effect of postage on sputum positivity, recoverable load, AST profile, microbiome, proteome or metabolome in sputum samples. These data suggest postal sputum samples may be a valuable tool for clinical and research applications.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Postal sputum samples for clinical and research applications in chronic lung infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Date Crossref
30/06/2026
Éditeur
openRxiv
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesGut microbiota and healthPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.