Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Are RAS inhibitors necessary during intensive immunosuppression for lupus nephritis? Real-world evidence from the STAR cohort

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: While guidelines advocate renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) for renoprotection in lupus nephritis (LN), evidence is largely extrapolated from non-lupus populations. Evidence specifically evaluating RASi efficacy during the intensive induction phase of active LN remains scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world impact of adding RASi to standard induction therapy on renal remission and glucocorticoid tapering in LN. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the STAR (Treat-SLE-to-Target) registry. Patients receiving ≥3 months of continuous RASi during induction were classified as RASi, while those without RASi exposure during follow-up were classified as non-RASi. Propensity score overlap weighting was applied to balance baseline characteristics. The primary endpoints were rates of complete renal remission (CRR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included total renal remission (TRR), the magnitude and rate of proteinuria reduction and glucocorticoid dosage. RESULTS: Among 314 patients, 220 received RASi and 94 did not. The RASi group had higher baseline 24-hour urinary protein and hypertension prevalence. After weighting, characteristics were balanced. Weighted analyses showed no significant difference in CRR at 12 months (58.7% vs 64.7%, p=0.428) or 6 months (43.1% vs 53.4%, p=0.169). Conversely, 6-month TRR was significantly lower in the RASi group (59.0% vs 76.8%, p=0.026). Proteinuria percentage reduction was comparable between groups, and RASi use was not associated with accelerated glucocorticoid tapering or more rapid decline in disease activity. Multivariable analysis identified LN at SLE onset and baseline pyuria as independent predictors of CRR, but not RASi usage. CONCLUSION: Adding RASi to standard induction therapy provided no additive benefit for renal remission or proteinuria reduction within the first 12 months nor did it facilitate glucocorticoid tapering. The haemodynamic antiproteinuric effects of RASi appear overshadowed by potent anti-inflammatory treatment during active LN.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Are RAS inhibitors necessary during intensive immunosuppression for lupus nephritis? Real-world evidence from the STAR cohort
Date Crossref
01/01/2026
Éditeur
BMJ
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Peking University Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Department pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Peking University First Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé

Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Department — Peking University et Peking University First Hospital.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchRenal and Vascular PathologiesRenin-Angiotensin System Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.