Comparative Analysis of Latarjet Procedure and Free Bone Block Techniques in the Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: This updated systematic review and meta-analysis provide a focused synthesis of contemporary evidence on clinical outcomes reported after the Latarjet procedure and Free Bone Block (FBB) techniques for anterior shoulder instability, focusing on recurrence, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sport, complications, and osteoarthritis progression. Given that most available studies report single-procedure cohorts, between-technique comparisons were interpreted in the context of indirect evidence and study-level heterogeneity. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The updated search included studies published from 2019 to May 2024 and was integrated with 70 studies from the previous review that were re-screened according to the same eligibility criteria. Eligible studies reported outcomes for the Latarjet or FBB procedure, with a minimum 2-year follow-up and at least five patients in the relevant treatment cohort. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 and MINORS tools. Outcomes were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled estimates were calculated separately for each procedure, and between-technique contrasts were treated as exploratory and descriptive when appropriate. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. Results: Ninety-eight studies with 6043 patients and 6071 shoulders were included: 72 on Latarjet, 23 on FBB, and 3 direct comparative studies. Both procedures were associated with low recurrence rates, improved PROMs, and comparable return-to-sport rates. Recurrence was 7% for Latarjet and 5% for FBB. Return to sport was 66% after Latarjet and 65% after FBB. Complication rates were 5% for Latarjet and 8% for FBB, while osteoarthritis progression was 12% and 9%, respectively. PROMs improved after both techniques, although differences between procedures should be interpreted cautiously because of the indirect nature of most comparisons and substantial heterogeneity across studies. Conclusions: Both Latarjet and FBB procedures were associated with generally favorable outcomes for anterior shoulder instability with bone loss in the included studies. The available evidence suggests broadly comparable clinical outcomes, with possible differences in complication profile, recurrence pattern, and osteoarthritis progression. However, these findings should be interpreted considering differences in patient characteristics, follow-up duration, surgical technique, graft type, and outcome definitions across studies. Current evidence does not allow definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of one technique over the other, but it provides useful descriptive outcome profiles to inform clinical decision-making and guide future direct comparative research.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.