Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

How Reliable Are Official Annual Suicide Numbers in Sri Lanka?

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
12Institutions déclarées
6Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : lk, gb, dk, us, tw, kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract: Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes surveillance of suicide and suicide attempts as a core component of national suicide prevention strategies. Aims: In Sri Lanka, police registers serve as the main source for national suicide reporting. This study evaluated the completeness of police suicide records by linking them with hospital and civil registration data and examining the extent to which suicide deaths identified across these sources were captured in police registers. Method: A secondary analysis was conducted on a case series of suicides identified through a prospective surveillance system established for a randomized controlled trial in Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka (April 2019–September 2023). Police records were linked with hospital and civil registration data. Sensitivity and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated overall and stratified by hospital admission status and method of suicide. Results: A total of 663 suicide deaths were identified across the three sources, with 310 reported by all. Police registers recorded 615 deaths, with a sensitivity of 91.0% (95% CI: 86.8%–93.8%) for hospital deaths and 94.0% (95% CI: 91.2%–95.8%) for nonhospital deaths. Method-specific sensitivity was 93.2% (95% CI: 89.1%–95.8%) for pesticide ingestion (n = 237), 70.7% (95% CI: 55.5%–82.6%) for nonpesticide poisoning ( n = 41), 97.3% (95% CI: 94.8%–98.7%) for hanging ( n = 336), and 77.6% (95% CI: 63.6%–87.0%) for other methods ( n = 49). Limitations: Findings are limited to one district and may not be generalizable nationally. Conclusions: Police registers are a largely comprehensive source of suicide data in Sri Lanka, although some cases are missed, particularly for less common methods. This underreporting suggests national suicide rates may be slightly underestimated. In countries lacking a WHO-recommended robust civil registration and vital statistics system, police data remain an important source for suicide surveillance and public health planning.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
How Reliable Are Official Annual Suicide Numbers in Sri Lanka?
Date Crossref
12/06/2026
Éditeur
Hogrefe Publishing Group
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesGun Ownership and Violence ResearchHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.