Engineered Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 for the High Level Biosynthesis of γ-Aminobutyric Acid
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA), a vital bioactive component, is biosynthesized via the decarboxylation of L-glutamate (L-Glu) catalyzed by glutamate decarboxylase (GAD). However, the GADs from various sources commonly suffer from low thermal stability, which hampers their industrial applications. In this work, four ancestral sequences of GAD (Anc19, Anc20, Anc28, and Anc30) were designed via an ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) approach. Thereafter, the genes were synthesized and heterologously expressed in the probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN). Among all variants tested, Anc28 exhibited the highest catalytic performance. The Km and kcat values were determined to be 26.80 mM and 57.41 s−1, respectively, yielding a catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of 2.14 s−1mM−1, which was 2.71-fold higher than that of the wild-type enzyme. Meanwhile, compared with the wild-type GAD, Anc28 exhibited a 6.74 °C increase in T5015 and a 4.1-fold extension in t1/2 at 60 °C. Furthermore, the GABA synthesis system using dormant Escherichia coli Nissle (T7)/pET28a-gadBAnc28 cells as the biocatalyst and pure water as a sole medium was also constructed. Upon completion of the 4 h reaction, the GABA titer reached 307.53 g/L with a conversion ratio of 99.36%. The resulting engineered strains were successfully employed for the efficient biosynthesis of GABA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Engineered Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 for the High Level Biosynthesis of γ-Aminobutyric Acid
- Date Crossref
- 11/06/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.