Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

Efficacy of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in high-risk neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Objectives To compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes of high-risk neutropenic patients receiving or not fluoroquinolone prophylaxis. Study eligibility criteria Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating overall mortality and rate of febrile episodes, of bloodstream infections and of isolation of a fluoroquinolone-resistant strain among patients receiving or not prophylaxis. Participants Patients with high-risk neutropenia due to haematological malignancies. Interventions Prophylaxis with either ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin. Comparator No prophylaxis. Methods of data synthesis We conducted a meta-analysis pooling risk ratios (RRs) through random effect models. Results Among 1731 articles screened, 18 original studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, accounting for a total of 12,586 patients, 7157 (56.9%) of which receiving fluoroquinolones prophylaxis. The analysis assessing the primary outcome including 12,134 patients showed similar mortality rates between groups (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79–1.37, p = 0.77), with a low statistical heterogeneity observed (I 2 49.4%, p = 0.022). These findings were confirmed (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89–1.50, p = 0.27) in the sub-analysis excluding studies conducted in settings with low prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance, on a total of 3121 patients, and a low heterogeneity was observed (I 2 27.6%, p = 0.18). Regarding the incidence of febrile episodes, a lower rate was observed among the 1701 patients receiving prophylaxis as compared to the 1514 not receiving prophylaxis (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.88–0.96, p = 0.006); similarly, a lower rate of bloodstream infections was demonstrated among subjects receiving fluoroquinolone prophylaxis (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47–0.75, p < 0.001) in a meta-analysis including 11,681 patients. Finally, no difference in the isolation rate of fluoroquinolone resistant strains was observed (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.34–2.20, p = 0.77) among 1481 patients included. Conclusions Our data suggest that fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in high-risk neutropenic patients is associated with a reduction in the incidence of febrile episodes and bacteraemia but does not provide a survival benefit.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Efficacy of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in high-risk neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Date Crossref
27/05/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Neutropenia and Cancer InfectionsBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.