Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and molecular adequacy between conventional endobronchial ultrasound, contrast-enhanced endobronchial ultrasound and elastography for hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies: a retrospective observational study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a cornerstone for mediastinal staging in lung cancer; however, sampling of bulky or necrotic lymph nodes remains challenging, often leading to inadequate tissue for molecular analysis. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and molecular adequacy of conventional EBUS, contrast-enhanced EBUS (CE-EBUS) and EBUS elastography in patients with hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies. Methods: ) >2.5]. Patients with suspected autoimmune or lymphoproliferative disease were excluded. All lymph nodes were bulky (>30 mm) and/or showed radiologic necrosis. All patients were distributed into three groups based on the technique used for lymph node evaluation: Conventional EBUS (n=26), CE-EBUS (n=23), and elastography (n=25). CE-EBUS was performed following the intravenous administration of 4.8 mL sulphur hexafluoride. Final diagnosis was based on histopathology and clinical-radiological follow-up in negative cases. Molecular adequacy was defined as the availability of sufficient viable material for standard molecular analyses. Diagnostic accuracy and molecular adequacy were compared across techniques, including a subgroup analysis focusing on bulky or necrotic lymph nodes. Results: Baseline demographic, clinical, radiologic, and metabolic characteristics were comparable across groups. Overall diagnostic accuracy did not differ significantly among techniques. In analyses adjusted for bulky and necrotic lymphadenopathy, CE-EBUS was associated with higher molecular adequacy compared with conventional EBUS, while no statistically significant differences were observed between conventional EBUS and elastography. Conclusions: CE-EBUS seems to improve diagnostic and molecular yield, particularly in bulky or necrotic lymph nodes, by identifying vital tissue. Elastography provides complementary stiffness information, enhancing overall lymph node characterization. These results could expand upon prior evidence supporting CE-EBUS utility in mediastinal staging.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and molecular adequacy between conventional endobronchial ultrasound, contrast-enhanced endobronchial ultrasound and elastography for hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies: a retrospective observational study
Date Crossref
01/04/2026
Éditeur
AME Publishing Company
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsTracheal and airway disorders

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.