sc-rDSeq: a robust and cost-effective full-length total RNA sequencing method for single cells reveals multilayered heterogeneity in drug-resistant lung cancer cells
Rattachement africain : il. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
sc-rDSeq is a scalable, full-length total RNA droplet-based technology that captures both polyadenylated and nonpolyadenylated RNAs, including histone RNAs, small and long non-coding RNAs, and enhancer RNAs. It achieves a 10-fold increase in UMIs per cell compared to conventional scRNAseq like 10× Chromium and inDrops, while remaining simple and cost-efficient. Applied to lung cancer cells, sc-rDSeq uncovered hidden heterogeneity, divergent signaling pathways, and non-polyA RNA variations undetectable by 3' end-based methods. Following EGFR inhibitor treatment, cell cycle arrest was detected through non-polyA histone messenger RNA expression, revealing seven distinct subpopulations of cells with upregulation of different persister-related programs, like migration, sterol synthesis and matrix formation. Additionally, by leveraging single-cell expression variability and pseudo-bulk analyses, sc-rDSeq unveiled alternative splicing events and single nucleotide variations that distinguished the drug resistant subsets. sc-rDSeq therefore opens the way for in-depth personalized medicine applications through massive-scale and multifaceted analysis of different RNA species, splicing events, and sequence variations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- sc-rDSeq: a robust and cost-effective full-length total RNA sequencing method for single cells reveals multilayered heterogeneity in drug-resistant lung cancer cells
- Date Crossref
- 13/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.