Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Doctor-child communication and caregivers’ willingness to recommend hospital: a secondary analysis using pediatric patient experience data

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Doctor-child communication is central to pediatric care, yet current research often marginalizes child-centered interactions and fails to isolate which specific behaviors drive systemic hospital metrics. This study addresses these gaps by using The Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (Child HCAHPS) framework to deconstruct communication into three discrete behaviors. We aimed to assess their distinct effects on caregivers' overall hospital rating and willingness to recommend, thereby clarifying the link between triadic clinical interactions and institutional loyalty. Methods: A retrospective multicenter analysis was conducted using cross-sectional survey data from the validated Chinese version of the Child HCAHPS. The sample included caregivers of pediatric inpatients discharged from six top-tier National Regional Centers for Pediatrics (NRCP) in China, ensuring geographic and institutional diversity. Data on caregiver perceptions of the three doctor-child communication behaviors, overall hospital rating, and willingness to recommend were collected upon discharge. Ordinal logistic regression models were employed to examine associations, adjusting for key covariates including child's global health status and caregiver demographics. A path analysis was then conducted to quantify the indirect association of the overall hospital rating. Results: Among 1,010 triadic participants, 59.2% of children were male, 85.0% were under 12 years of age, 68.5% of respondents were mothers, and the overall Top-Box rate was 88.4% for hospital rating and 90.4% for recommendation willingness. Encouraging the child to ask questions was significantly associated with overall hospital ratings [β=1.075, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.141-2.009] and willingness to recommend the hospital (β=1.382, 95% CI: 0.425-2.339). The child's perceived health status was a significant covariate for overall hospital ratings. Path analysis revealed that the overall hospital rating partially mediated the relationship between encouraging questions and recommendation willingness (indirect association β=0.338, 95% CI: 0.206-0.471), accounting for 57.81% of the total association. Conclusions: Encouraging children to ask questions emerges as a pivotal, distinct communication practice that directly enhances caregiver loyalty and indirectly strengthens it through an improved overall perception of the hospital. This finding underscores that empowering child participation transcends simple information exchange, representing a core component of patient-centered care in triadic clinical encounters. Strengthening this and other child-centered communication behaviors through targeted clinician training and supportive healthcare system design should be a priority for improving perceived pediatric care quality and fostering family trust and advocacy.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Doctor-child communication and caregivers’ willingness to recommend hospital: a secondary analysis using pediatric patient experience data
Date Crossref
01/04/2026
Éditeur
AME Publishing Company
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Capital Medical University Department of Medical Record Statistics pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • China Medical University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • School of Medical Humanities Department of Art Pedagogy pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • College of Health Management pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Institute of Medical Information pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Medical Record Statistics — Capital Medical University, China Medical University et Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, avec 3 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Patient Satisfaction in HealthcarePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.