Patent foramen ovale: when does it need closure?
Rattachement africain : pk, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in approximately 25% of the general population. Its clinical significance is primarily in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Randomized trials have evaluated whether transcatheter PFO closure reduces recurrent stroke compared to medical therapy. Evidence outside stroke, including migraine, decompression illness, and platypneaorthodeoxia syndrome, is limited. We reviewed major randomized controlled trials and extended follow-up studies evaluating transcatheter PFO closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Key trials included RESPECT, REDUCE, CLOSE, DEFENSEPFO, and RESPECTLate. Study populations, procedural outcomes, and post-procedural management were summarized. Non-stroke indications were evaluated using available randomized and observational data. In the RESPECT trial (n=980; mean age 46±11 years; 38% female; median follow-up 5.9 years), recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 3.6% of patients undergoing PFO closure vs 5.8% with medical therapy (HR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31–0.999; p=0.046). The REDUCE trial (n=664; mean age 45±10 years; 42% female) demonstrated a 77% relative risk reduction in recurrent stroke with closure vs antiplatelet therapy alone (1.4% vs 5.4%; p=0.002). The CLOSE trial (n=663; mean age 45±11 years; 40% female) reported no recurrent strokes in the closure group vs 14 events (6%) in the anti-platelet group over 5.3 years (p<0.001). DEFENSEPFO (n=120; mean age 52±12 years; 45% female) showed stroke in 0% vs 12.9% with medical therapy at 2 years (p=0.013). RESPECTLate demonstrated sustained benefit over 10 years (HR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29–0.999; p=0.046). Pooled analysis across trials indicated a 59% lower risk of recurrent stroke with closure (HR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.200.83). The benefit was most pronounced in patients with large shunts or atrial septal aneurysms. Post-procedural atrial fibrillation occurred in 35% of patients; serious procedural complications were <2%. Dual antiplatelet therapy was administered for 3–6 months, and successful shunt elimination exceeded 90%. Evidence for PFO closure in migraine with aura or decompression illness remains limited; closure in platypneaorthodeoxia syndrome shows symptomatic improvement based on small case series. Transcatheter PFO closure significantly reduces recurrent stroke in adults aged 1860 years with cryptogenic stroke and highrisk anatomical features. The procedure is generally safe, with low rates of serious complications. Nonstroke indications remain investigational, and patient selection with multidisciplinary evaluation is essential to maximize benefit and minimize risk.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Patent foramen ovale: when does it need closure?
- Date Crossref
- 31/03/2026
- Éditeur
- PAGEPress Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Dow University of Health Sciences Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Duke University Division of Cardiology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Medicine — Dow University of Health Sciences et Division of Cardiology — Duke University.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.