CEPI Workshop Report: Applying Disease X Vaccine Library and Knowledge Base Approaches to Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS)
Rattachement africain : no, kr, jp, us, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
On 9-10 December 2025, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the International Vaccine Institute (IVI) convened a workshop in Seoul under CEPI's Disease X Program. The primary objective was to identify existing gaps needing to be filled and streamline vaccine development and preparedness for Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS). CEPI's partners and experts discussed a multifaceted agenda, ranging from understanding the evolving epidemiology to the refinement of animal models and immunological assay harmonization. Key outcomes included the refinement of Target Product Profiles (TPPs) specifying use cases for both peacetime and outbreak contexts, alongside a recommendation for a core immunoassay panel aimed at harmonizing evaluation frameworks and mitigating the challenges posed by low SFTS prevalence. Integration of the One Health approach emerged as a critical strategy for SFTS prevention, complemented by proactive regulatory engagement to compress vaccine development timelines. This report summarizes these key insights from the workshop, delineating a strategic framework for delivering safe, effective, and accessible vaccines for SFTS and broader Disease X threats.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- CEPI Workshop Report: Applying Disease X Vaccine Library and Knowledge Base Approaches to Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS)
- Date Crossref
- 28/03/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.