Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Integrating enriched case data from national laboratory testing with population-based case-control analyses: a novel statistical likelihood-ratio methodology for PS4 applied to 325,345 breast cancer cases and 671,006 controls

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
19Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb, us, ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: For many evidence criteria within v3.0 of the ACMG/AMP guidelines, methodologies have been developed to empower their use outside categorical evidence strengths. However, no such methodology has been established for case-control data (PS4). With the release of large-scale unselected case-control datasets and expansion of nationally-collected laboratory datasets enriched for pathogenic variant carriers, there is potential to combine datasets across ascertainment contexts in a more quantitative manner using novel likelihood ratio tools. Methods: Using our published PS4-LR-Calculator, we calculated a combined log likelihood ratio (PS4-LLR) across five datasets (three unselected, and two enriched), and estimated enrichment of pathogenic variants in clinically-ascertained laboratory data using truncating variant prevalence. Results: Data were combined for 10,694 missense variants from 325,345 female breast cancer patients and 671,006 controls of Western European ancestry for five breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, CHEK2). A combined LLR was produced for 4,563 missense variants; 922 variants received evidence towards pathogenicity (LLR≥ 1), and 3,188 received evidence towards benignity (LLR≤ -1). Conclusion: This flexible, variant-level methodology combines nationally-collected ‘enriched’ datasets with unselected case-control cohorts, expanding the available information for case-control analysis, boosting power for existing analyses and enabling further exploration of variants in atypical penetrance scenarios.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

BRCA gene mutations in cancerGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.