Beyond Affinity and Amplification: SPARK-seq and the Future of Clinical Laboratory Medicine
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
For decades, clinical laboratory medicine has relied on a limited set of molecular recognition strategies—principally antibodies, nucleic acid hybridization, and mass spectrometry—to translate biological signals into clinically actionable measurements. While these technologies have enabled remarkable advances in diagnostics and therapeutics, each faces inherent constraints related to scalability, specificity, or preservation of biological context. As precision medicine increasingly demands molecular tools capable of resolving cellular heterogeneity and detecting low-abundance biomarkers in complex clinical matrices, there is renewed interest in alternative binding modalities that can meet the analytical performance specifications required for regulated diagnostic environments. Aptamers have long been proposed as such an alternative. Despite theoretical advantages, including chemical stability, ease of modification, and scalable synthesis, their clinical impact, particularly in regulated diagnostic environments, has remained modest compared with antibody-based technologies. This gap reflects not conceptual failure, but practical limitations: conventional selection approaches are low throughput, poorly preserve native protein conformations, and rarely link binding events to cellular phenotype. Consequently, aptamer discovery has struggled to keep pace with the expanding complexity of clinical biomarker landscapes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Beyond Affinity and Amplification: SPARK-seq and the Future of Clinical Laboratory Medicine
- Date Crossref
- 17/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University Health Network Division of Clinical Biochemistry pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Toronto Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
Division of Clinical Biochemistry — University Health Network, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology — University of Toronto et Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.